imageimage
 Home     The Quran     Quranic Audio     Khutbahs     Message Board     Start a Blog     About Us     Contact Us


After Seeing Deedat-Swaggart Debate, Mr Kenneth L. Jenkins, a US Former Minister, Became Muslim
Unknown author
Saturday, December 24, 2005


Register and Join our Online Community & Forums for Free.
A Great way to meet lots of muslims and learn about Islam.

As a young boy I was raised with a deep fear of God. Having been partially raised by a grandmother who was a Pentecostal fundamentalist, the church became an integral part of my life at a very early age. By the time I had reached the age of six, I knew all too well the benefits awaiting me in Heaven for being a good little boy and the punishment awaiting in Hell for little boys who are naughty. I was taught by my grandmother that all liars were doomed to go to the Hellfire, where they would burn forever and ever.

My mother worked two full-time jobs and continued to remind me of the teachings given to me by her mother. My younger brother and older sister did not seem to take our grandmother’s warnings of the Hereafter as seriously as I did. I recall seeing the full moon when it would take on a deep reddish hue, and I would begin to weep because I was taught that one of the signs of the end of the world would be that the moon would become red like blood. As an eight-year old child I began to develop such a fear at what I thought were signs in the heavens and on earth of Doomsday that I actually had nightmares of what the Day of Judgement would be like.

Every Sunday we would go to church dressed in all of our finery. My grandfather was our means of transportation. Church would last for what seemed to me like hours. We would arrive at around eleven in the morning and not leave until sometimes three in the afternoon. I remember falling asleep in my grandmother’s lap on many occasions. For a time my brother and I were permitted to leave church in between the conclusion of Sunday school and morning worship service to sit with our grandfather at the railway yard and watch the trains pass.

At age sixteen I began attending the church of a friend whose father was the pastor. This went on for only several months before the church closed down. After graduating from high school and entering the university I rediscovered my religious commitment and became fully immersed in Pentecostal teachings. I was baptized and “filled with the Holy Ghost,” as the experience was then called. As a college student, I quickly became the pride of the church. Everyone had high hopes for me, and I was happy to once again be “on the road to salvation. “

I attended church every time its doors would open. I studied the Bible for days and weeks at a time. I attended lectures given by the Christian scholars of my day, and I acknowledged my call to the ministry at the age of 20. I began preaching and became well known very quickly. I was extremely dogmatic and believed that no one could receive salvation unless they were of my church group. I categorically condemned everyone who had not come to know God the way I had come to know Him.

Welcome to the Real Church World

I soon discovered that there was a great deal of jealousy prevalent in the ministerial hierarchy. Things had changed from that to which I was accustomed. Women wore clothing that I thought was shameful. People dressed in order to attract attention, usually from the opposite sex. I discovered just how great a part money and greed play in the operation of church activities. There were many small churches struggling, and they called upon us to hold meetings to help raise money for them.

I was told that if a church did not have a certain number of members, then I was not to waste my time preaching there because I would not receive ample financial compensation. I then explained that I was not in it for the money and that I would preach even if there was only one member present… and I’d do it for free! This caused a disturbance. I started questioning those whom I thought had wisdom, only to find that they had been putting on a show. I learned that money, power and position were more important than teaching the truth about the Bible.

Cases of adultery and fornication went unpunished. Some preachers were hooked on drugs and had destroyed their lives and the lives of their families. Leaders of some churches were found to be homosexuals. There were pastors even guilty of committing adultery with the young daughters of other church members. All of this coupled with a failure to receive answers to what I thought were valid questions was enough to make me seek a change. That change came when I accepted a job in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

A New Beginning

It was not long after arriving in Saudi Arabia that I saw an immediate difference in the life style of the Muslim people. They were different from the followers of Elijah Muhammad and Minister Louis Farrakhan in that they were of all nationalities, colors and languages. I immediately expressed a desire to learn more about this peculiar brand of religion. I was amazed with the life of Prophet Muhammad and wanted to know more. I requested books from one of the brothers who was active in calling people to Islam.

I was supplied with all of the books that I could possibly want. I read each and every one. I was then given the Holy Qur’an and read it completely several times within four months. I asked question after question and received satisfactory answers. What appealed to me was that the brothers were not keen on impressing me with their knowledge. If a brother did not know how to answer a question, he would tell me that he simply did not know and would have to check with someone who did. The next day he would always bring the answer. I noticed how humility played such a great role in the lives of these mysterious people of the Middle East.

I was amazed to see the women covering themselves from face to foot. I did not see any religious hierarchy. No one was competing for any religious position. All of this was wonderful, but how could I entertain the thought of abandoning a teaching that had followed me since childhood? What about the Bible? I knew that there is some truth in it even though it had been changed and revised countless numbers of times. I was then given a videocassette of a debate between Shaykh Ahmed Deedat and Reverend Jimmy Swaggart. After seeing the debate I immediately became a Muslim.

I was taken to the office of Shaykh ‘Abdullah bin ‘Abdul-’Azeez bin Baz to officially declare my acceptance of Islam. It was there that I was given sound advice on how to prepare myself for the long journey ahead. It was truly a birth from darkness into light. I wondered what my peers from the Church would think when they heard that I had embraced Islam.

It was not long before I found out. I went back to the United States for vacation and was severely criticized for my “lack of faith.” I was stamped with many labels - from renegade to reprobate. People were told by so-called church leaders not to even remember me in prayer. As strange as it may seem, I was not bothered in the least. I was so happy that Almighty God, Allah, had chosen to guide me aright that nothing else mattered.

Now I only wanted to become as dedicated a Muslim as I was a Christian. This, of course, meant study. I realized that a person could grow as much as they wanted to in Islam. There is no monopoly of knowledge - it is free to all who wish to avail themselves of the opportunities to learn. I was given a set of Saheeh Muslim as a gift from my Qur’an teacher. It was then that I realized the need to learn about the life, sayings and practices of Prophet Muhammad.

I read and studied as many of the hadith collections available in English as possible. I realized that my knowledge of the Bible was an asset that is now quite useful in dealing with those of Christian backgrounds. Life for me has taken on an entirely new meaning. One of the most profound attitude changes is a result of knowing that this life must actually be spent in preparation for life in the Hereafter.

From IslamWeb.net
[Summarized from Mr Kenneth L. Jenkins' (Former Minister and Elder of the Church - Indiana) Story of embracing Islam]

image image image
 

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Insert Smiley

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


 
image

Hi Bro. Kenneth L. Jenkins!  I read your story several times in the last 2 weeks.  I loved every word of it.  My daughter and I just professed the Shahada last sunday Sept. 17, 2006.  I Praise Allah, Yehovah and Yahsuha for you.  Why?  I am a former Pentecostal Apostolic Preacher that was fed up with the church junk and not seeing people living the word that they claim they know.  I also did not want my 15 year old daughter to continue to be harassed by so called christian youth and their parents to live an ungodly lifestyle.  My child wants to live for Allah even before we converted.  There is so much we have in common about this.  I too have a calling to minister the truth of Islam to our left behind brothers and sister out there.  They need much prayer and help to come out of that religious babylon which means religious confusion.  My family and I are praying for your strength and encouragement.  Press on and don’t give up or go back. More people will come when they hear your testimony and the one I will give, also my daughter to the youth out there in those churches.  PEACE AND BLESSINGS IN THE NAME OF ALLAH!

Assalamo Alaikum brother,

I’m very pleased to go through your life of embracing Islam..

Please continue to preach as much non-muslims as you can.

May Allah’s blessings be with you.

whats is so wrong abnout being a homosexual. In this article it sounds as if it is a disease or plague or something. Homosexual love is no diffrent than heterosexual love. homosexual promiscuity is no diffrent than heterosexual promiscuity. that is where me and Islam differ.

although i agree with you that people are hypocritical of their abhorrence of homosexual promiscuity over heterosexuality, in general it is prohibited

this is where you differ with islam as well as christianity and judaism

John 14:6 “I am the way , the truth, and the life, no man comes to the father except through me.”
Jesus christ
John 8:58 “I tell you, before Abraham was, I AM”
John 10:30 “ I and the Father are one.”
John 11:25 “ I am the resurrection and the life. The man who believes in Me will live, even though he dies, and he who lives and believes in Me will never die”
Jesus Christ

Simply put Mohammed was a man who rewrote the Bible to suit his idea of what he wanted religion to be and if you want to know what he really said , read Prophet of Doom ,by Craig Winn and see what “ the prophet” himself wrote and said. It sure wasn’t the same as what Jesus said and it is easy to see the extreme contrast of the two.
Just because the modern day followers of Islam live a more restrictive lifestyle (under threats to life and limb)than a bumch of luke warm Christians back home doesn’t mean the teachings of Muhammed are valid or even respomsible for their restrictive lifestyle. (Do you really think a Burkha is appropriate dress for anybody?) As my pastor in college said, “It is common for weak men of God who have not hidden the word in their heart to try to blame Jesus for some of the stupid things his followers have done. The focus should be on Jesus as compared to Muhammed , not lukewarm Christians in America to Islamic state threatened Muslims. If you look at the life and claims of Christ you only have three choices. Either he was who he said he was( as above) or he was a lunatic , and if he was not crazy and not who he said he was, then he was just a deceiver. Being a “great moral teacher” is not an option when you make the claims he made as I quoted above.
How could any rational person choose Mohammed over Jesus when you really examone the life of Christ. I would recommend anyone with any question read “The Case for Christ” , by Lee Strobel, an aethiest who examined Christ’s life from every angle and surrendered his life to him as Lord and Savior. This seems a much more intelligent approach than allowing other people’s behavior to be your reference point.

to respond to gcore and anybody else who believes Muhummad was a worse person than Jesus Christ all I can say is read the Quran. One must read the Quran before engaging in a critique of it. Secondly I am not a Muslim, I was born Muslim but shifted to Agnosticism, but I do know that Muhummad was illiterate. So what I want to know is how an illiterate person in the desert could say such things? The Quran is beautifully written and in order of the line of succesive authroity the Quran takes precedence over Hadith that the author of the ‘prophet of doom’ cites. Thirdly Jesus Christ emphasized poverty and love while Muhummad emphasized Tahwed (unity of God) and submission to God. If we follow the Islamic narrative and believe, for the sake of argument, that Jesus Christ was the Messiah for the Jews, and only the Jews, who rejected him and so God saved him decieving the people witnessing the ‘crucifixtion’ then we can see how Muhummad becomes the Messiah for the entire world. That’s what makes Islam make sense in a somewhat historical context. Muhummad is the natural sucessor to Christ, even in the Bible it speaks of a man name ‘Ahmad’ who will come after Jesus who will speak God’s will. The exact reference is the Song of Solomon 5:16
Muhammad (pbuh) is mentioned by name in the Song of Solomon 5:16.
The Hebrew word used in this verse is Mahamaddim. The ending letters ‘im’ is a plural of respect, majesty and grandeur, just as in Elohim (the God). Without ‘im’ the name becomes Mahamadd which was translated as “altogether lovely” in the Authorized Version of the Bible or ‘The Praised One’, ‘the one worthy of Praise.’ In Arabic, Muhammad means the one who is most praised.

* Song of Solomon 5:16
His mouth is most sweet: yea, he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.

The phrase “he is altogether lovely” reads in the Hebrew as “he is Mahamaddim.”

The main reason I don’t believe in Islam though is because of it’s unequal/unfair trreatment of women. Like it is accepted dogma that women are viewed as inferior to men, with such a starting assumption I find it hard to say Islam is egalitarian. Maybe so for the people of the desert 1400 years ago but not for our world. Islam needs to reform before I come back to it.
-peace and love all

Can andy one get me this vedio or DVD through to my address:
Ayda Negash
P.O.Box 9585
Addis Ababa
Ethiopia

May Allah Bless you brother for you choosing the truth irrespective of being pressurised or acquired by any kind of patiallity or pre-conceived notion of muslim or islam being false religion. May allah bless all of us to preach and practice the religion of truth Islam.
May Allah enter us in Jannah. Ameen
Assalamuaikum

you will burn in hell,you traitor,lowlife SOB i wish you a terrible death by a painfull disease

I’m sure that’s exactly what Jesus or Muhummad, peace be upon them both, would have said....lol. No offence but uneducated people like this last poster just are not only funny and dangerous but just plain ignorrant. READ A BOOK SOMETIMES.
-peace to all-
“talkng about love” - Jimmy Page smile

may Allah(SWT) continue to guide you, and may He give you the strenght to face the challenges ahead.

This article literally bought tears to my eyes. Subhanallah, what an inspiring and great story. This is just truly an amazing thing and i’m glad you have found both Islam and peace.

sir this column was good and aducative, thanking you very much

Thank you very much for this article.I found some interesting information,and the way you have presented is quite interesting.

I have a question for any Muslims. Surah 9:30 seems to me to be historically incorrect as the Jews never worshiped Ezra as the son of God. Please explain if anyone can.

Short note to Nizam.
In regards to your comment about my first post, I never said “Mohammed was a worse person than Jesus.” You misunderstood my post. The point of my post is that Jesus, by his own words, claims deity which Mohammed never did. Therefore it is not an option to call Jesus just a great philosipher, or teacher as the Koran does. Due to the fact that Jesus made these statements , then some response to them is necessary and there are only three options rationally. 1. He was a liar meaning he knew he wasn’t the Messiah and yet he just misled people, or 2. He was a lunatic and was misled himself about who he was, or 3. He was who he said he was. These are the only three options available due to his own claims. To further research this you will have to read the words of Jesus in the New Testament. Once you do you will see that option 3 is the only one that makes sense. God Bless.

To Nizam. gbchhc is also Gcore.
By the way, it is a shame that Mr Kenneth Jenkins was so poorly grounded in the word of God and (clearly not a man of significant learning or personal faith) that he allowed a simple argument between a discredited and doctrininally inept TV preacher and a Muslim teacher to determine his own faith.

To gbchhc who is also Gcore:

I quote from your post, “You misunderstood my post. The point of my post is that Jesus, by his own words, claims deity which Mohammed never did”.

Where did we get these words attributed to Jesus (pbuh)? Where in the libraries of wisdom do we find the Gospel according to Jesus Christ (pbuh). Sadly no such Bible exists so what Christians rely on as the words of Jesus (pbuh) are not the words of Christ (pbuh) but the words of the disciples writing 70-200 years after Jesus’s (pbuh) beautiful life. Imagine people writing about us 70-200 years after our lives, of course there would be inaccuracies. So with that said I reject the premise of your arguments forcing us to chose 1 of 3 options because we don’t know what Jesus (pbuh) said, in his own words. I personally believe he was a great moral teacher and much more. I believe he had the Spirit of God in him, as did all the other prophets of old including Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses and Muhummad (peace be upon them all). I also believe this Spirit of God is not purely restricted to Prophets as great people such as Caliphs Abu Bakr and Ali (peace be upon them both) and Iman Husain (peace be upon him) all exemplify diffrent aspects of the Spirit of God. It was the Spirit of God, mentioned in Genesis, who was with God before the world was created, very 1st chapter.
So all in all until we find a Gospel according to Jesus (pbuh) we will never know the truth. The beauty of the Quran I find, even though I am not a Muslim, is how it mentions not only Jesus (pbuh) but many other prophets as well. Even Jesus’s (pbuh) mother the Virgin Mary (pbuh)is mentioned in the Quran. One chapter of the Quran is even entitled Surah Maraym (Mary) and refers to her. The question I pose to my friends everywhere is how can an illiterate Arab in the 600s AD compose such beautiful poetry mixed with wisdom that nearly 1.5 billion people accept not as the word of Muhummad (pbuh) but as the word of God. I am not a Muslim, primarily because of surah 9:30’s historical inaccuracy and their unfair treatmen of women, but does that mean the Quran is wrong in it’s entirety? I dont think so. In the Bible we have the word of God, the word of men, the word of historians and incest stories while in the Quran we have the word of God and most likely some “liberal lisence” by Muhummad (pbuh).
I just for the love of me don’t understand how a man can be God b/c if that is so then who did Jesus (pbuh) cry out to when he was being nailed to the cross? Himself? God? The trinity makes no logical sense. Try picturing a Father, a Son and a Holy Ghost/Spirit in your mind. Are there 1 picture in your mind or 3?

-God bless all-

Dear Nizam,
Well you covered a lot of territory in your post, all the way from the historical aspects of recording the words of Jesus to the concept of the Trinity, not to mention the origins of Islam.
Let’s take it one at a time.
1. The historical aspects of the recordings of the words of Jesus.
First of all, recorded words by an eyewitness is accepted in courts of law as factual just as much as the recollection of words spoken by the person who spoke them. Even though Jesus never sat down and wrote his words do you think he didn’t intend for them to be remembered or recorded? Why even teach them if he didn’t expect them to be remembered or recorded?
The words of Genesis which are accepted as the word of God by you were written down over many centuries and most likely were originally written by a member of the scribes and dictated by Moses. Does that mean it doesn’t count simply because Moses didn’t writeit himself? In addition there is widely accepted that way before the Gospel of Mark came into circulation in the early church there were other written documents whose origins were much sooner. So it’s not like someone decided 70 years after the fact, “Hey, I think I’ll sit down and try to remember what Jesus said while I was with him.” There were without question other documents available to early Christians as well as letters upon which all this critically important data was recorded already. It was too important not to have written it down. In addition the these documents, with one primary one referred to as Q by most New Testament Scholars, were actual eyewitness accounts which is the most accurate way of recording historical events as accepted by history scholars wordwide both secular and religious.Therefore the gospels are accurate eyewitness accounts.  In a book by Josh McDowell, “Evidence that demands a Verdict” he states that in terms of factual reliable data the New Testament is the most reliable book in terms of historical accuracy in existence in the world. So if an eyewitness says Jesus said it and the last survivng( not the first) manuscriptwas written by the eyewitness even 70 years later it still stands as reliable. Therefore let’s assume the words of Jesus and his claims to deity are factual based on the above, what do you do with the three options?
One last thing. there is a very good reason Jesus did not writea gospel. Can you imagine what would happen to the Gospel of Jesus in terms of how people would treat it? It would have been put in a golden cased vault and put in the Vatican where it would have been worshipped by people world wide and acccess to it would have been very limited. It would have become an object of worship much like anything was that was even remorely thought to have been associated with the person of Jesus. They even have a wooden splinter that some thought was a part of the original cross that was worshiped as a sort of religious talisman by many. It is by design not accident that Jesus did not leave anything of earthly material that could be connected with him so that people would not get sidetracked by worshipping a type of a golden calf but instead would focus on who he was ( Lord, lunatic, or liar) and why he came. 
I appreciate your willingness to discuss this in a true intellectual manner. 
In my next post I will cover the Trinity and the Origins of Islam.
God Bless.

Nice to know about you.Its really nice to know that you are now follower of Islam.

I assume femanol was talking about the poorly grounded weak minister mentioned above.Not me.